http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10103/1049834-109.stm

John Paul was loved; Benedict may be doing a better job

Tuesday, April 13, 2010


The world didn't always agree with Pope John Paul II, but it always seemed to love him. Handsome and charismatic, with an actor's flair and a statesman's confidence, he transformed the papacy from an Italian anachronism into a globe-trotting phenomenon. His authority stabilized a reeling church; his personal holiness inspired a generation of young Catholics. "Santo subito!" the Roman crowds chanted as he lay dying. Sainthood now!

They will not chant for Pope Benedict XVI. The former Joseph Ratzinger was always going to be a harder pontiff for the world to love: more introverted than his predecessor, less political and peripatetic, with the crags and wrinkles of a sinister great-uncle. While the last pope held court with presidents and rock stars, Cardinal Ratzinger was minding the store in Rome, jousting with liberal theologians and being caricatured as "God's Rottweiler." His reward was supposed to be retirement, and a return to scholarly pursuits. Instead, he was summoned to Peter's chair -- and, it seems, to disaster.

The drip, drip, drip of sex abuse cases from Pope Benedict's past started a month ago with a serious incident: a pedophile priest who was returned to ministry in Munich by then-Archbishop Ratzinger's subordinates, and perhaps with his knowledge.

The more recent smoking guns, though, offer more smoke than fire. The pope is now being criticized not for enabling crimes or covering them up, but because in the 1980s and 1990s the Vatican's bureaucracy moved slowly on requests to formally laicize abusive priests after they already had been removed from ministry.

But the smoke is damaging enough. "The Failed Papacy of Benedict XVI" ran a recent headline in Der Spiegel, the newsmagazine of the pope's native Germany.

If you judge a pontiff on his ability to do outreach, whether to lukewarm believers or the secular world, this is probably accurate. Amid the latest wave of scandal, Catholicism needed the magnetic Pope John Paul II, master of bold gestures and moving acts of penance. Instead, the church is stuck with Pope Benedict, bookish and defensive and unequal to the task.

But there's another story to be told about Pope John Paul II and his besieged successor. The last pope was a great man, but he was also a weak administrator, a poor delegator and sometimes a dreadful judge of character.

The church's dilatory response to the sex scandals was a testament to these weaknesses. So was Pope John Paul's friendship with the Rev. Marcial Maciel Degollado, the founder of the Legionaries of Christ. The last pope loved him and defended him. But we know now that Father Maciel was a sexually voracious sociopath. And thanks to a recent article by The National Catholic Reporter's Jason Berry, we know the secret of Father Maciel's Vatican success: He was an extraordinary fund-raiser, and those funds often flowed to members of Pope John Paul's inner circle.

Only one churchman comes out of Mr. Berry's story looking good: Joseph Ratzinger. Mr. Berry recounts how Cardinal Ratzinger lectured to a group of Legionary priests, and was subsequently handed an envelope of money "for his charitable use." The cardinal "was tough as nails in a very cordial way," a witness said, and turned the money down.

This isn't an isolated case.

In the 1990s, it was Cardinal Ratzinger who pushed for a full investigation of Hans Hermann Groer, the Vienna cardinal accused of pedophilia, only to have his efforts blocked in the Vatican.

It was Cardinal Ratzinger who persuaded Pope John Paul, in 2001, to centralize the church's haphazard system for handling sex abuse allegations in his office.

It was Cardinal Ratzinger who re-opened the long-dormant investigation into Father Maciel's conduct in 2004, just days after Pope John Paul had honored the Legionaries in a Vatican ceremony.

It was Cardinal Ratzinger, as Pope Benedict, who banished Father Maciel to a monastery and ordered a comprehensive inquiry into his order.

So the high-flying Pope John Paul let scandals spread beneath his feet, and the uncharismatic Cardinal Ratzinger was left to clean them up. This pattern extends to other fraught issues that the last pope tended to avoid -- the debasement of the Catholic liturgy, or the rise of Islam in once-Christian Europe. And it extends to the caliber of the church's bishops, where Pope Benedict's appointments are widely viewed as an improvement over the choices Pope John Paul made. It isn't a coincidence that some of the most forthright responses to the abuse scandal have come from friends and proteges of the current pope.

Has Pope Benedict done enough to clean house and show contrition? Alas, no. Has his Vatican responded to the latest swirl of scandal with retrenchment, resentment and an unChristian dose of self-pity? Absolutely. Can this pontiff regain the kind of trust and admiration, for himself and for his office, that Pope John Paul II enjoyed? Not a chance.

But as unlikely as it seems today, Pope Benedict XVI may yet deserve to be remembered as the better pope.

 

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10103/1049834-109.stm#ixzz1a7UfewRu